GG-Logics
See It · Understand It · Improve It
LOGIC-MODEL™  v1.3
💾 Scenario:
Tab 1 — Inputs
This is the single source of truth for every figure in the model. Gold cells are editable — type a value directly, or click the slider icon to drag instead. Every other tab reads from here.
InputsBudgetActuals
Sales Quantity
Sales Price per unit sold
Revenue
Production Quantity
Opening Stock (quantity)
Closing Stock (quantity, calculated)
Material Cost
Price per unit of material
Quantity material used per sale item
Cost of material used (Calculated)
Labour Costs
Price per labour hour
Quantity labour hours required per unit made
Cost of Labour per unit
Variable Overhead Rate per Unit
Variable overhead rate per labour hour
Variable Overhead Cost per unit (Calculated)
Variable costs of sale per unit (Calculated)
Total Fixed Overhead Cost for the period
Standard Fixed OH absorption rate per unit
How to use this sheet: Gold cells are inputs. Click the small slider icon next to any gold cell to reveal a drag slider instead of typing — click it again to hide the slider and type directly. All other tabs in this model are read-only displays driven entirely by what you set here. The Fixed Overhead absorption rate is always struck on Budgeted Production (not Budgeted Sales) — this matches standard costing convention, since overhead is incurred to make units, not to sell them.
Stage 2 — The Budget: What we planned to achieve
These figures come from Tab 1 — Inputs. This view is read-only; go back to Tab 1 to change anything. Watch how the income statement is built entirely from those figures.
📋 All inputs live on Tab 1. This stage shows what those numbers produce.
Key ratios & insights
Budgeted Stock Movement (units)
What the budget tells us: This income statement is built entirely on standard (planned) figures, using the absorption costing method. Every cost line is: Volume × Standard cost per unit. If Budgeted Production differs from Budgeted Sales, a stock build or release is being planned — a common, deliberate choice when smoothing production against seasonal demand. The budget is the benchmark — every actual result will be measured against this.
Stage 3 — What actually happened vs what we planned
These figures come from Tab 1 — Inputs. The two income statements sit side by side. Notice the profit gap — but can you explain why it happened?
📋 All inputs live on Tab 1. This stage shows what those numbers produce.
Actual Income Statement (Absorption)
Stock Movement — Actual (units)
The profit gap is visible — but the income statement alone cannot tell you why it occurred. Was it because we sold more units? Or charged a lower price? Or because costs were higher? All of these blend into a single profit number. This is the limitation the CFO must overcome.
Stage 4 — Basic variances: The first layer of insight
We now split the profit gap into its components. But notice — each variance is still a blended number. A cost variance mixes price and efficiency together. The real story is still hidden.
Actual IS
Basic Variance Summary
The limitation of basic variances:
A material cost variance of tells you costs were different — but was it because the price per kg changed, or because we used more kg per unit? These are completely different management problems requiring completely different actions.

Basic variance = Actual cost − Budgeted cost
This blends price and efficiency into one number. Standard costing separates them.
Stage 5 — Standard costing: Separating Price from Efficiency from Volume
These rates and quantities come from Tab 1 — Inputs. Watch how each blended variance splits into PV and EV.
📋 All inputs live on Tab 1. This stage shows what those numbers produce.
Basic variances (Stage 4)
The standard costing insight: Each blended variance now splits into two independent signals.

Price Variance = (Std price − Actual price) × Actual quantity
Efficiency Variance = (Std qty − Actual qty) × Std price

Price variances are usually a procurement / market issue. Efficiency variances are a production / operations issue. They require completely different management responses.
Stage 6 — Absorption vs Marginal: Two lenses, two different profit answers
The same data, the same period — but two costing philosophies can give different reported profits whenever production and sales volumes differ. Understanding why is essential for management decisions.
📦 Opening stock, production and sales all live on Tab 1.
Current Stock Position (units)
Opening stock
0 units
Closing stock
0 units
Absorption Costing — Operating Statement
Marginal Costing — Operating Statement
ABSORPTION COSTING
Fixed overhead is absorbed into each unit produced at a standard rate, and carried in stock value until the unit is sold. Profit only reflects FOH for units actually sold this period.

Std FOH/unit = Budget FOH ÷ Budget units
FOH in Cost of Sales = Std FOH/unit × Units SOLD


If production exceeds sales, some FOH sits in closing stock instead of hitting the P&L — profit looks higher.
MARGINAL COSTING
Fixed overhead is treated as a period cost — the full actual amount is deducted in the period incurred, regardless of how many units were produced or sold.

Contribution = Revenue − All variable costs
Profit = Contribution − Actual fixed overhead (in full)


No FOH is ever carried in stock. Closing stock is valued at variable cost only.
The management insight: The profit difference between absorption and marginal costing is not caused by the volume variance directly — it is caused by fixed overhead sitting in closing stock under absorption costing. When production equals sales, no stock builds or depletes, and both methods report identical profit. A CFO must always check the inventory movement before comparing profit figures prepared under the two methods.